Wickless clearomizer

[crackrat]

Hey, everyone, first post here so sorry if I screw things up or don't follow protocol.

Just a quick question: Does anyone prefer a wickless clearomizer over one with a wick? Why? Why not?

Thanks in advance....and great forum you have here. I just spent an hour getting up to speed.

Cheers!

[KimJongUn]

I prefer the ones with a wick. They seem to be better made and last longer.

[Tam]

Not sure if the bottom feeders like the Pro Tank and the Vision Nano have small hidden wicks but these seem to have less flavor muting than the ones with wicks. I think it's all a matter of personal preference myself.

[Jeffb]

I concur with Mr Un

[mcquinn]

I would think given the way these things work unless you lower the resistance and or jack up the voltage you would get better vapor with a wick to meter the liquid to the element . Flooded elements just cannot get hot enough to make vapor under normal conditions.

Edited June 11, 2013 by mcquinn