Krakkan

Yes very very nice website!

Well I figure I will let you know a little special I will be doing for you guys due to your demand for Passthroughs for 510 I have some incoming. But I have something that will be sold with passthrough that will make you very happy.... So my (True 510 "Vape Away" Accessory Kit) is born..... My kits will include: 1 USB Passthrough -- For smoking while attached to USB 1 USB Charger -- To get some juice into those extra batteries 1 dual port USB Car Adapter -- So you can use your passthroughs on the road through your cigarette lighter and so can a passenger (Chris and Sean) :P They will be listed for Pre-Sale Next week sometime. Price to be announced!!!!

What a tool lol

So close to 7k

The parts are interchangeable with the 306a model I know :P

In Honor of the review I have decided to do a Pre-Sale lol figured I would give you guys first shot at a special edition purple LED 510 Regards, JD

Great review guys thanks I am proud to be the first green screen review lol.... Man these 510's need to get here already. lol Keep up the great work Chris and Sean and thanks for the review it rocks...

lol I know more than one :P damn Louisianians like to party A lot

I dunno but we can breathe easy for another day I aint bitching about it

He is right make it a link works better!!!

Yessir FK we have the 510's in now I may keep em all for myself though rawr :P

From my friend Toni @ Bloog she is on the mailing list too: From: "Hitch, Mary C", INTERNET:Mary.Hitch@fda.hhs.gov To: , SMOKEFREE Date: 5/1/2009 5:05 PM RE: Email from Heather Zawalick (CBER) Dear Mr. Godshall: Your communication was forwarded to me for response as a function of FDA's Office of External Relations. The email to which you refer contains factual errors and does not reflect an official FDA action or policy. Sincerely, Mary C. Hitch Senior Policy Advisor Office of External Relations

http://reason.com/blog/show/133265.html

Jacob Sullum | May 1, 2009, 4:46pm Bill Godshall of Smokefree Pennsylvania reports in a mass email message that the Food and Drug Administration plans to proceed with a ban on electronic cigarettes, devices that deliver nicotine vapor without tobacco or combustion products. Godshall reproduces the following message from Heather Zawalick of the FDA's Office of Legislation, which says the agency will announce enforcement actions against the three largest e-cigarette distributors on Tuesday: Subject/Headline: FDA Takes Enforcement Action on Electronic Smoking Products Planned Release Date: May 5 Driving Event: Compliance action Rollout Plan: Extensive rollout planned including press conference at HHS, press release, fact sheet, video for upload to YouTube, podcast, consumer article, consumer Q &A, key message points, internal media Q & A, Op-Ed, photos of products for posting on Internet. Other background, hidden factors: Action involves three largest distributors. One of the distributors has just sued FDA seeking a restraining order to prevent us from holding their product at the border. There is keen interest in this subject. E-cigarette kiosks are all over town, including Montgomery Mall. They're being advertised as a safer alternative to cigarettes. Our concern is that this might introduce nonusers to nicotine use. This is a drug delivery device. The content of the products have not been analyzed by FDA. To be sold, they would have to be approved by the agency. Our concern is that this might introduce nonusers to nicotine use. And what if it did? Separated from the dangers of smoking, nicotine use is not a big health concern. The FDA itself has approved various nicotine replacement products (gum, patches, even an inhaler), some of them for over-the-counter sale, even though they theoretically might "introduce nonusers to nicotine use." That possibility is an incredibly lame justification for preventing smokers from switching to a product that eliminates virtually all the risks associated with standard cigarettes. In an open letter to Zawalick, Joel Nitzkin of the American Association of Public Health Physicians says the pending FDA ban seems to be "based entirely on the undocumented assumption that electronic cigarettes may have the potential to attract additional teenagers to nicotine use and addiction." That concern seems to be fanciful: Godshall says "there is no evidence that e-cigarette products have been marketed to youth, nor is there evidence of youth use of e-cigarette products (most of which cost more than $100)." In any case, Nitzkin notes, the government can impose age restrictions without stopping "current adult smokers who are unwilling or unable to quit" from enjoying "the health benefits this product can offer." By Nitzkin's reckoning, based on the available research, smokeless nicotine products "promise a risk of illness and death well under 1% of the risk posed by cigarettes." In his own letter to Zawalick, Godshall argues that "denying 45 million cigarette smokers access to exponentially less hazardous smokefree nicotine alternatives would result in millions of preventable deaths among smokers, millions of nonsmokers continuing to be exposed to tobacco smoke pollution, and tens of thousands of e-cigarettes users reverting back to smoking cigarettes." He adds that "it is absurd for the FDA to even contemplate protecting the deadliest nicotine products (cigarettes) from market competition by the least hazardous nicotine products." More on the e-cigarette controversy here and here. E-cigarette testimonials here and here. A report on testing of the Ruyan e-cigarette here (PDF).

Very very talented for sure

Figured I post so u all would get an email :P

With anything people can find an allergy, but most commonly from what I have seen it isn't a common occurrence.

Works Great I use it all the time

Yes very good find Patches gum etc is big money they don't want us cutting into that.

That one Doctor game is too addicting dont remember name but I got stuck playing it for awhile.

We need to start our own articles with some of the studies being done in the UK I am tired of reporters and doctors who have done no research preaching about how bad these could be. Not speaking of this article but in general mainly.Would seem a little effort would go a long way. We have any writers out there or reporters who can help?