Sharon Posted May 27, 2011 Posted May 27, 2011 I don't see this going anywhere! Associated Press link to article
Christopher Posted May 27, 2011 Posted May 27, 2011 Interesting. Wonder if this "new" technology works the way the Ploom device does.
Sharon Posted May 27, 2011 Author Posted May 27, 2011 I don't know Chris, but the article says "By avoiding the burning process altogether,..." Doesn't the Ploom device heat up, but at a lower temp?
Sharon Posted May 27, 2011 Author Posted May 27, 2011 Interesting. Wonder if this "new" technology works the way the Ploom device does. Now this is really scary Studies Yeah, $1200 + a possible additional $300 to inject me with an unknown chemical. Think I will have to pass on this one. Call me crazy!!!!!!
Cheriepye Posted May 31, 2011 Posted May 31, 2011 I thought the system we were already using delivered nicotine in a safe manner. No second hand smoke and nothing burning. These people are nuts. I'm with Sharon. No one is sticking me with something I don't know about. C'mon, nicotine "vaccinations?" Cherie
bugsman Posted May 31, 2011 Posted May 31, 2011 Interesting. The cigarette companies probably figure they better do something.
Brian Posted May 31, 2011 Posted May 31, 2011 OR THERE PATENTING THE " NIC-O-DIC" LOL! +1 for a good laugh!
Kingbtheone Posted June 1, 2011 Posted June 1, 2011 great way to market cigs if you think... they spend a million on a inhaler that looks like a c0ck, no one will buy it, and keep smoking analogs
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now