E-Cigs Banned On Us Flights ?!?!
#1
Posted 11 February 2011 - 10:55 AM
#2
Posted 11 February 2011 - 11:39 AM
P.S. I do not support or condone breaking the law or rules of flying.
#3
Posted 11 February 2011 - 11:39 AM
#4
Posted 11 February 2011 - 11:49 AM
#5
Posted 11 February 2011 - 11:55 AM
I have been practicing my stealth moves all week for my up coming trip.
#6
Posted 11 February 2011 - 12:06 PM
I got a kick out of reading the posts following the article. Some of them are just too funny, some are just down right stupid, and some of them are spot on. If you don't have anything better to do, give them ago!
#7
Posted 11 February 2011 - 12:19 PM
Quote
Lets break it down, shall we!
Quote
False, only American airlines has a stated policy (to the best of my knowledge)
Quote
I'm sorry - what? Lautenberg wanted to make sure officials oppose this - is that your job - to make sure others follow your will?
Quote
Correct, because smoking rules apply to the burning of tobacco, not the vaporization of e-juice.
The basis of this will be we do not know if they cause a threat, so rather than determine that before you ban it. Wouldnt that be the appropriate course of action?
lets face it once its banned it is not coming back, and there will be no attempt to prove or disprove the risk factors.
#8
Posted 11 February 2011 - 12:52 PM
Erika
#9
Posted 11 February 2011 - 12:56 PM
#10
Posted 11 February 2011 - 01:33 PM
Erika, on 11 February 2011 - 12:52 PM, said:
Erika
Nope, not from me. I personally agree with you. But I do take exception with government action that lacks foundational basis. If the position they were taking were to say a temporary ban while we examine this issue to determine the correct answer I would have no issue with it. But to ask the Dept. of Transportation to issue a ban based on existing smoking laws is a reach and a knee jerk reaction rather than a thoughtful one.
Christopher, on 11 February 2011 - 12:56 PM, said:
I am going to have to disagree with you big guy (doesn't take long for us noobs to spread our wings does it!
Lautenberg just happens to be from NJ. Most of the major pharmas are Headquartered in Northern Jersey or NY. The Pharma cos have got to be getting very concerned about the rapid increase in vaping as a potential profit hit to their ineffective recurring profit streams from Chantix, the patches and the gums. Add to that the successful blocking of the FDA and they have to be getting concerned and speaking through their lobbyists to the lawmakers.
While it is anecdotal of course, just last night I went to see a band play locally. (Dark Star Orchestra for anyone wondering - great show) anyway, upon entry you had to empty your pockets and get patted down. The dude saw my eGO and asked - hey is that one of those e-cigs. I told him yes. He said hes really thinking about one and that it's okay to use it inside the venue which is non-smoking. Just the same I mostly stepped outside to the smoker patio to use it (okay I did take a few scattered hits inside - but I had the ok to do so) and let me tell you at least 15 people asked me about it, wanted to understand it and have been really thinking about it but where not sure if they should believe it. I personally couldn't believe how many questions I got about and the number of people who asked.
I have no doubt in my mind that the usage of e-cigs is taking off at this point - not that I have to tell you. I am sure you see the growth here. This has to be of great concern to the pharma and tobacco companies. I would be shocked if they were not working behind the curtains to raise doubt about the safety of vaping, and working to get lawmakers to extend smoking laws to e-cigs in as many cases as possible. With hundreds of millions of dollars at stake to big pharma I have little doubt that they are indeed working very hard behind the scenes to quickly extend as many bans as possible. But of course I have no proof - just my own gut feeling and years of research back in the late 1990's on the overstatement of the risks of smoking on smokers and by-standers - all largely funded by pharma industry, who just happen to have been introducing all kinds of NRT's.
P.S. But I totally agree that vaping while not illegal is still an activity that should be done with respect and concern for those around you. Just as I would hope the would be respectful and take the time to understand what it is before they object.
Edited by ripple, 11 February 2011 - 01:35 PM.
#11
Posted 11 February 2011 - 08:39 PM
Ripple- we love love love darkstar! Never been patted don at a concert though.
#12
Posted 11 February 2011 - 08:55 PM
Erika, on 11 February 2011 - 08:39 PM, said:
Ripple- we love love love darkstar! Never been patted don at a concert though.
Glad to hear you like DSO. I Have know rob the keyboard player for more than 20 years it was great to see hime last night and go have a few drinks after the show with him. It should help you understand my forum name !
Okay sorry don't mean to get off topic here.
#13
Posted 11 February 2011 - 09:54 PM
#14
Posted 11 February 2011 - 11:39 PM
This comment is idiotic......"Some e-cigarette distributors have touted their convenience because they can be "smoked" anywhere traditional cigarettes are not allowed"
They shouldn't even use the word SMOKED....It should have been worded that "some e cig distributors have touted their convenience because they can be USED where traditional cigarettes are not allowed"
Anyway, we should each do what we are comfortable doing and if told not to do it, or even asked not to do it, then don't do it. I have total respect for rules, and other people determining what is permitted on or in their property. Personally I don't allow people to have shoes on my furniture. My parents make EVERYONE remove shoes when they come into their home, even repair people, OR they have to put shoe covers on, which my parents provide....so I have no problem with rules on property that doesn't belong to me. I mean, many stores don't allow you to eat or drink in them, nobody has a fit about that, at least not that I have seen. When you come down to it, a restaurant, store, mall, hospital, dr's office, etc is PRIVATE property....it is not public just because other people are there. An airplane or airport for that matter is also private property and if they say no smoking or no vaping, oh well. I wouldn't really have a problem with no vaping in places where no smoking is allowed. I do think it is silly, but if it makes the zealots feel better, fine. When I smoked I had to follow those rules as well.....at least with this we CAN sneak into a washroom or stealth vape since it doesn't smell. I didn't start vaping with the idea that I could do it anywhere. I just don't want them to ban it, that's all. Just my opinion.
#15
Posted 12 February 2011 - 07:22 AM
#16
Posted 12 February 2011 - 10:17 AM
#17
Posted 15 February 2011 - 01:16 AM
Prouddad, on 12 February 2011 - 10:17 AM, said:
I think you are wrong, and I'm not even going to touch erika's bold comment. We all have opinions but to be so bold on day 4.?...
Fact is, vaping is not smoke. Best course of action - inform/get permission from those in charge where you'd like to vape. Why not? It's VAPOR, not some harmful particles. PG IS FDA APPROVED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION.
Here are your choices : 1. keep hiding and you'll find that the gov will continue to lead the sheep into whatever they say and ultimately making you a criminal, or 2, educate and recruit everywhere you go and you'll build an army that will stand beside you in the fight against tyranny. Dont forget how many people out there smoke. They dont want to smoke but they dont know that they have options. Youre lucky to have found the answer and it's YOUR responsibility to show others the way out.
Fact is, the american public is ignorant about vaping. The ****ty scandalous radio commercials trying to trap consumers into contract vaping isn't helping either. So if you want to keep vaping and you want to continue buying ejuice without massive tobacco-like taxes then gtfo of the closet already and inform the world.
Dude.
Edited by elDuderino, 15 February 2011 - 01:19 AM.
#18
Posted 15 February 2011 - 01:35 AM
Edited by juliery, 15 February 2011 - 01:58 AM.
#19
Posted 15 February 2011 - 05:30 PM
#20
Posted 15 February 2011 - 09:52 PM










